Whispers of forgotten lore have found my ears, the currents of time flows through my veins with every beat of my heart and bear visions of death and despair. Just a guy doing good on the high-seas."Hear me, mortals, and heed me well. I would lean towards good, since he doesn't strike me as reckless or free-spirited. Since all we have is the 1 pedia entry, it's hard to determine which. He isn't big on allies and making agreements with others. He pretty much epitomizes the idea of doing the right thing and breaking every law that stands in your way. They just do what is right without any bias towards order or chaos.īasium = CG. The Elohim don't strike me as particularly lawful, just good. And granted there's the odd leader who goes against the grain, like that evil dwarven guy, but I think some of your leaders don't follow their civ's expected alignment well enough I'd like to think "I see hippus, must be chaotic". I'm especially not too happy about the wide discrepancies between individual leaders of the civ. In general, I feel you have a bit too many neutrals for my liking. The mechanos strike me as chaotic personally, given their intentions of overthrowing the gods, disrupting the old order, etc, and bringing in a new era of mankind. They need a chaotic leader, and absaroke didn't seem too lawful to me. I notice you changed the chislev alignments from what was previously posted. You know how I feel about cualli, but we already discussed that. I'd say make her slightly less evil, but a lot more chaotic. Dark elves are known for loving partying, and being all about backstabbing. Chaotic neutral is synonymous with magicįaeryl definitely needs to be chaotic, moreso than being evil. I'd make all the hippus leaders chaotic, personally Is there a reason why Mordmorgan isn't chaotic? I think all ljosalfar leaders need a little more of a chaotic shift He's devoted his eternal life to hunting down and destroying demons wherever they appear. But his lawful/chaotic stance is unquestioningly far towards lawful. A case could be made for basium not actually being good given the disregard for life, and I wouldn't mind him being on the low end of good so he can easioly become neutral. Check his pedia entry where he crushes people without hesitation because they show the slightest demonic influence, even though they were offering to help. The elohim are a protective, dutiful people.īasium is so overwhelmingly utterly lawful good that It's illogical to think of why you'd choose anything else. I think ethne and einion should be lawful. As he is only able to adopt a Lawful Evil religion, nothing will change his alignment away from this. Taranis - Lawful Evil (750 / -275) As with Cassiel, he is incapable of changing alignment.Perpentach - Chaotic (-750 / 0) Fits the definition of Chaotic Neutral as 'Insane'. ![]() Xivan - Lawful (625) As with Decius, may not choose Lawful/Chaotic alignment.Cassiel - True Neutral (0 / 0) BA does not effect his alignment Will always be neutral.Decius - Lawful (350) While his Good/Evil status is choosable, he does NOT get to choose his Lawful/Chaotic status.Most drastic would be Perpentach or Falamar, but I think both fit better in the new alignments. Most Good/Evil alignment values are simply the current value multiplied by 1.5 (Scale used to cap at 500), several have been changed, however. Should be easy to recognize where exactly a leader falls. The numbers in parenthesis are their Broader Alignment values, Lawful/Chaotic and then Good/Evil. Multi-civ leaders are left with the first civ they come under. The civs/leaders are listed in XML order, as I'm just writing it as I come to it in the file. Feel free to pick it apart and try to change my mind, putting this out now for just that purpose Only a few days until I'd like to release, though. Alright, going to list the leader alignments I've settled on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |